V
ents:
- Yup. I'm anathamatized by Trent- as are all who believe the Pauline doctrine of justification. Rome isn't anti-Lutheran. It just condemns all of us to hell. Nice that it's inconsistently said otherwise elsewhere (interesting that the equally "infallible" Vatican II and Trent contradict each other on this point). Presumably, though, you are at least honest enough to recognize the JDDJ for the fraud it is.
- There are many good reasons here not to be a Catholic. You can only come to the conclusions of the Council of Trent by tossing out large portions of the New Testament and making up your own doctrines, which the Catholic Church claims it has the power to do. If I have to decide between the doctrines of the Apostle Paul and the theologians of the Roman Catholic Church and bet my soul on the outcome, I will go with the Apostle.
- There are many good reasons not to be a Protestant. You can only come to the conclusions of the Reformers by tossing out large portions of the New Testament and making up your own doctrines, which the Reformers certainly did. If I have to decide between the doctrines of the Apostle Paul and the those of the Reformers and bet my soul on the outcome, I will go with the Apostle.
- Bob and Bill . Could you please both of you be kind enough and tell us , how is Trent against saint Paul and his doctrine on justification? By the way , there is no such thing as Pauline doctrine of justification as if you are saying that in the bible and in the new testament there are different doctrines of justification . So again and very humbly and kindly , i insist that you explain to us Catholics , which canon of the council of Trent contradicted saint Paul and the bible ? Thank you both very much in advance for the tons of explanations whith which you are going to provide us . GBU
No comments:
Post a Comment